1 edition of Survey of income and program participation (SIPP) 1988 panel found in the catalog.
Survey of income and program participation (SIPP) 1988 panel
1991 by Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research in Ann Arbor, Mich .
Written in English
These data sets examine the distribution of income, wealth, and poverty in American society and gauge the effects of federal and state programs on the well-being of families and individuals.
First ICPSR release, June 1991 --T.p. wave 1.
|Statement||principal investigator, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.|
|Series||ICPSR -- 9568, ICPSR (Series) -- 9568., Techinical documentation|
|Contributions||United States. Bureau of the Census|
|The Physical Object|
The PSID collects data from families, using a concept of economic dependence like the SCF to determine which related persons living together constitute a family. All rights reserved. The SIPP collects wealth data from each adult member 15 and older of the sample household. We can match over time. The panel greatly appreciates the work of Timothy Smeeding of Syra- cuse University, who prepared a stimulating paper on priorities for improv- ing income data from surveys and administrative records.
A major use of the SIPP has been to evaluate the use of and eligibility for government programs and to analyze the impacts of modifications to those programs. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. Obviously, the interest in the survey is on income and program participation, whether we are getting better measurements of it. Differential attrition does not explain the shortage of high-income families either.
We had planned on 30, so I guess we did all right there. The re-engineering focused on several key goals, including reducing burden on respondents, reducing program costs, improving accuracy, improving timeliness and accessibility, and improving relevance. I mean, the content of SIPP was developed around these core data. Ownership of Assets and Liabilities SIPP estimates of particular components of wealth could be low because too few respondents report owning such components or because those who do report ownership do not report their full amounts. Library of Congress Catalog Card No. Important Information:.
Gods mercy surmounting mans cruelty
Contaminant Transport Through Acquitards:
Training in agriculture
Beautiful bones and butterflies
turn of the screw and Daisy Miller.
Zimbabwes food insecurity paradox
heart is a lonely hunter.
Readers Break (Readers Break)
Mother camp: female impersonators in America.
Historical sketches of Monaghan from the earliest records to the Fenian movement
Tamil cultural influences in South East Asia
look at Cortona
Moral & religious extracts
High-efficiency air filtration
Elements of compact semigroups
Choices and Connections 88-89
What factors affect change in household and family structure and living arrangements? This Advisory Committee advises and recommends to Census changes in the SIPP content, particularly changes that relate to data required for policy analysis.
That is, the sample was divided into four groups, and all of the households in a given group were interviewed once every four months, also on a rotating basis.
We have not done much telephone interviewing at this point. These shortcomings mostly affected the survey's estimates of high-income families and the types of assets that such families hold disproportionately.
The government will have lively debates as to what ought to be considered in that module. Another six subpopulations consist of families with an elderly head or spouse, a head nearing retirement, a prime working-age head 30 to 60an aged head or spouse receiving Social Security benefits, a nonaged head or spouse receiving such benefits, and a nonaged disabled head or spouse.
Applications will be accepted from faculty; postdoctoral fellows; advanced doctoral students; federal, state, and local-level policy and research analysts; researchers at non-profit organizations; and others who would benefit from this workshop.
There are several different questions on income types that are asked about during the interview. Response Brackets Less effective use of range responses could be a factor in the SIPP's generally low estimates of assets. For assets and particularly liabilities, the differentials are generally very similar between the two surveys.
This workshop will not offer instruction in statistics or formal research methods. For further information or to obtain an electronic copy of the full report, contact Alexi Strand e-mail: alexander.
Respondents are asked whether or not they participate in the labor forcewhat government programs they participated in, and about their incomes. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.
But President Obama has unveiled his budget request for Fiscal Yearand it is my solemn duty as an advocate of all things census to make visions of smartphone-friendly questionnaires, linked government databases and shrinking dollar signs dance in your head.
Provide practical tips for handling the SIPP's complex sample design. Another could be they have moved, another they could have been institutionalized, or they could have died.
Frank Press is president of the National Academy of Sciences.
But unless the imputation methodology changed in some critical way between the two panels, the panel finding contradicts this interpretation. She demonstrated exceptional skills in synthesizing the panel's views and producing a coher- ent document, she readily appreciated different viewpoints on an issue, and she patiently and good-humoredly rewrote parts of the draft to meet con- cerns of panel members.
Provide participants with an opportunity to conduct analyses for their own research projects and produce preliminary findings along with an appropriate public-use SIPP data set that can be used upon return to an individual's home institution.
We are able to get a sense of the degree of assistance needed, who provides that assistance, and whether or not this assistance is paid for. When you are designing the survey you try to think about how you get the best data and how not to burden our interviewers.This book evaluates changes needed to improve the usefulness and cost-effectiveness of the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP).
Conducted by the Census Bureau, SIPP is a major continuing survey that is designed to provide information about the economic well-being of the U.S. population and its need for and participation in government assistance programs (e.g., social security.
Note: Citations are based on reference standards. However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study. The specific requirements or preferences of your reviewing publisher, classroom teacher, institution or organization should be applied.
An Assessment of the Current Population Survey and the Survey of Income and Program Participation Using Social Security Administrative Data Melissa L.
Koenig Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics, Social Security Administration E St SW, 9 th Floor, ITC Building, Washington, DC Email:[email protected] Dec 31, · Income, Assets & Program Participation: An Introduction The NLSY79 cohort is a unique source of income and asset information.
Family poverty. Validation study of reported prog ram participation by Marquis and Moore () reveals a bias due to net under-reporting o f Food Stamp Program participation of 13% (Wave data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation). We extend that analysis conditioning on demographic an d economic covariates.
• CPS, designed as a survey of labor force participation of U.S. population, has its limitation to understand the economic well-being of individuals and families – very long recall period (i.e., a design) – inadequately measures of irregular sources of income, government program .